« July 2007 | Main | September 2007 »

August 2007

August 23, 2007

FOIA: Whitehouse Closes Door

Or was it really open in the first place?

Dan Eggen
    The Washington Post

    Thursday 23 August 2007

Administrator of missing e-mails not subject to open-records law, it says.

    The Bush administration argued in court papers this week that the White House Office of Administration is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act as part of its effort to fend off a civil lawsuit seeking the release of internal documents about a large number of e-mails missing from White House servers.

    The claim, made in a motion filed Tuesday by the Justice Department, is at odds with a depiction of the office on the White House's own Web site. As of yesterday, the site listed the Office of Administration as one of six presidential entities subject to the open-records law, which is commonly known by its abbreviation, FOIA.

    Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonprofit group, filed a lawsuit in May seeking Office of Administration records about the missing e-mails, including when they were deleted from government computer files. CREW said it understood that internal White House documents had estimated at least 5 million e-mails were missing from March 2003 to October 2005.

    The Bush administration has not provided a number publicly. Some of the records may have been subject to a document preservation law administered by the National Archives and Records Administration. Congress has sought access to them as part of its probe into the administration's firing of nine U.S. federal prosecutors in 2006.

    Melanie Sloan, CREW's executive director, said that "one has to wonder if this is an effort by the White House to keep secret the details of how millions of White House e-mail suddenly went missing. The OA's disingenuous claim that it is not subject to the FOIA is contradicted by its own actions and statements."

    White House spokesman Scott Stanzel declined to comment yesterday.

    Much of the White House, including the offices of President Bush and Vice President Cheney, is not subject to FOIA, which allows the media and the public to demand disclosure of federal public records. But the Office of Administration, which was formed in 1977 and handles various administrative and technology duties, responded to 65 FOIA requests last year and even has its own FOIA officer, records show.

    In its 20-page motion, the Justice Department argues that past behavior is irrelevant, pointing to a 1996 appellate court ruling that found the White House-based National Security Council was not covered by FOIA even though it had complied with the law previously.

    As with the NSC, the government argues that the Office of Administration is not an "agency" as defined under the open-records statute because it has no substantial authority independent of the president.

    "To be sure, OA currently has regulations implementing FOIA and has not taken the position in prior litigation that it is not subject to FOIA," the filing says. "However, the D.C. Circuit has held that this is not probative on the question of whether an EOP unit does, in fact, satisfy FOIA's definition of 'agency.' "

    Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy for the Federation of American Scientists, said that given the previous ruling on the NSC, the White House may be successful in its bid to close off its administrative office to public scrutiny.

    "It's obnoxious, and it's a gesture of defiance against the norms of open government," Aftergood said. "But it turns out that a White House body can be an agency one day and cease to be one the next day, as absurd as it may seem.

No-Bid Contracts and Voting Standards

No-Bid Contracts Go to Vendors with Close Ties to Election Advisory Group

SNAPSHOT [click for full document—Part 1 | Part 2]

THE DISCLOSURE
Documents obtained by EPIC from the Election Assistance Commission describe two no-bid contracts for work on voting system standards given to vendors with ties to the Commission's technical advisory committee.

THE ISSUE
Integrity of federal voting system standards.

THE BACKGROUND
For decades, the development of voting technology standards and the certification of election equipment has been controlled by a small number of election administrators and vendors. The Help America Vote Act was intended to replace this closed system with a new process based on public input. However, the law limits the staff of the key government agency. More than 40 states are receiving nearly $2 billion in federal funds to purchase voting systems and support election administration.

THE SIGNIFICANCE
The Election Assistance Commission awarding no-bid contracts to those with ties to the agency's advisory committee could undermine trust in the nation's election system standards development process.

The Blind Leading the Crafty...No-Bid Contracting

FBI Investigates Halliburton's No-Bid Contracts

By John Solomon

Associated Press
October 28, 2004

The FBI has begun investigating whether the Pentagon improperly awarded no-bid contracts to Halliburton Co., seeking an interview with a top Army contracting officer and collecting documents from several government offices. The line of inquiry expands an earlier FBI investigation into whether Halliburton overcharged taxpayers for fuel in Iraq, and it elevates to a criminal matter the election-year question of whether the Bush administration showed favoritism to Vice President Dick Cheney's former company.

FBI agents this week sought permission to interview Bunnatine Greenhouse, the Army Corps of Engineers' chief contracting officer who went public last weekend with allegations that her agency unfairly awarded KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary, no-bid contracts worth billions of dollars for work in Iraq, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. Asked about the documents, Greenhouse's lawyers said Thursday their client will cooperate but that she wants whistleblower protection from Pentagon retaliation. "I think it (the FBI interview request) underscores the seriousness of the misconduct, and it also demonstrates how courageous Ms. Greenhouse was for stepping forward," said Stephen Kohn, one of her attorneys. "The initiation of an FBI investigation into criminal misconduct will help restore public confidence," Kohn said. "The Army must aggressively protect Ms. Greenhouse from the retaliation she will encounter as a result of blowing the whistle on this misconduct."

FBI agents also recently began collecting documents from Army offices in Texas and elsewhere to examine how and why Halliburton, a Houston-based oil services conglomerate, got the no-bid work. "The Corps is absolutely cooperating with the FBI, and it has been an ongoing effort," said Army Corps spokeswoman Carol Sanders. "Our role is to cooperate. It's a public contract and public funds. We've been providing them information for quite a while." The FBI declined to comment Thursday.

Wendy Hall, a Halliburton spokeswoman, said the company is cooperating with various investigations, but she dismissed the latest revelation as election politics. She noted Congress' auditing arm, the Government Accountability Office, found the company's no-bid work in Iraq was legal. "The old allegations have once again been recycled, this time one week before the election," Hall said. "The GAO said earlier this year that the contract was properly awarded because Halliburton was the only contractor that could do the work. "We look forward to the end of the election, because no matter who is elected president, Halliburton is proud to serve the troops just as we have for the past 60 years for both Democrat and Republican administrations," she said.

Cheney spokesman Kevin Kellems, asked if investigators had contacted the vice president or his office about the contracts, said they had not. Democrats have tried hard to make Halliburton an election-year issue Sen. Frank Lautenberg, a Democrat on the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee who has been investigating Halliburton's contracts, said his office was told the FBI recently sought documents from various government offices. The requests focused on how and why Halliburton got the Iraq contracts. "This multibillion dollar no-bid contract to Halliburton was suspicious from day one, and now our worst suspicions are confirmed," Lautenberg said. "The FBI doesn't get involved unless there are possible criminal violations."

In a formal whistleblower complaint filed last week, Greenhouse alleged the award of contracts without competition to KBR puts at risk "the integrity of the federal contracting program as it relates to a major defense contractor." The contracts were to restore Iraq's oil industry. Among the evidence cited in the complaint was an internal 2003 Pentagon e-mail that says the Iraq contract "has been coordinated" with Cheney's White House office. The vice president, who continues to receive deferred compensation from when he was Halliburton's chief executive in the late 1990s, has steadfastly maintained he has played no role in the selection of his former company for federal business.

The Army last week referred Greenhouse's allegations to the Defense Department's inspector general. Documents show FBI agents from Quad Cities, Ill., asked Tuesday to interview Greenhouse. Her lawyers declined to discuss the contacts. Greenhouse alleged in her complaint that after her superiors signed off on the Iraq business in February 2003, a month before the war began, and returned it for her necessary approval, she specifically asked why the work was being extended for several years. Beside her signature, Greenhouse wrote: "I caution that extending this sole-source effort beyond a one-year period could convey an invalid perception that there is not strong intent for a limited competition," the complaint said.

The oil restoration work was given to KBR without competitive bidding through 10 separate work assignments called "task orders." The orders were issued under an existing contract between Halliburton and the U.S. military that was awarded competitively in December 2001. While the Corps was authorized to spend up to $7 billion for the oil restoration work, the actual cost so far has been $2.5 billion. Halliburton is still working on the oil facilities, but it is now operating under a new, competitively awarded contract.


Home » Industries » War & Disaster Profiteering » Big, Easy Iraqi-Style Contracts ...

Big, Easy Iraqi-Style Contracts Flood New Orleans

by Pratap Chatterjee, Special to CorpWatch
September 20th, 2005

cartoon by Khalil Bendib

The day Hurricane Katrina struck Louisiana, Robert Boh watched the dramatic pictures of the unfolding disaster on television at his in-law's house in Jonesboro, Arkansas, where his family had taken shelter. As president of the biggest construction company in New Orleans, he was confident that the hundreds of miles of levees that he and his rivals have built over the decades would hold. "It never occurred to me," he said, that the 17th street canal would gave way. "I was shocked."

The next day the phones started ringing off the hook. One of the calls was offering work to repair the levees and drain the city from the Army Corps of Engineers, a federal agency run by the US military. Unable to access his New Orleans offices, which had six feet of water on the first floor, Boh drove down to work in nearby Baton Rouge, to help save the city where his grandfather had founded a construction business 96 years before.

Military Blackhawk and Chinook helicopters dropped sandbags into the breached levees in New Orleans, as Boh Brothers crews worked around the clock for a week. The work was a financial boost for the civil engineering company that had been $2 million in debt just over a year prior, because the Army Corps of Engineers had no money to pay them for installing floodgates for New Orleans’ Harvey Canal.

Before Katrina struck, Boh was starting to question if he really wanted to apply for more work from the Corps, which oversees the levees. "In 2004 and 2005, funding for our work has been cut," he told CorpWatch. Indeed, earlier this year, New Orleans district projected that it would get just $82 million in flood and hurricane protection projects, a 44.2 percent drop from the $147 million spent in 2001.

Today state and federal money and contracts are flowing into the stricken area and Boh Brothers is one of the key local beneficiaries. Right after completing the emergency repairs, Boh was sub-contracted to help pump water from the flooded city by the Shaw Group, a politically well-connected contractor that had worked on reconstruction in Iraq. Then the state of Louisiana awarded the company a new $30.9 million contract to fix the hurricane-damaged twin-span bridge that carries Interstate 10 traffic over Lake Pontchartrain.

Boh’s contract is tiny compared to the billions that will flow to the giants of the industry:
Halliburton , Bechtel and Flour. "The construction industry has stood up and is saying we are standing ready for your call," Lieutenant General Carl Strock told a September 2 Defense Department briefing. The Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Army have budgeted at least $62.5 billion in emergency aid for Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi, (not including rebuilding the levees), creating a boom for construction companies.

"They are throwing money out, they are shoveling it out the door," said James Albertine, a Washington lobbyist and past president of the American League of Lobbyists, told the New York Times. "I'm sure every lobbyist's phone in Washington is ringing off the hook from his clients. Sixty-two billion dollars is a lot of money -- and it's only a down payment."

"You are likely to see the equivalent of war profiteering -- disaster profiteering," said Danielle Brian, director of the Project on Government Oversight, a nonprofit government spending watchdog group. She notes that Joe Allbaugh, President Bush's former campaign manager and a former head of FEMA is now a lobbyist and consultant to both the Shaw Group and
Halliburton . (Melissa Norcross, a Halliburton spokeswoman, said Allbaugh has not, since he was hired, "consulted on any specific contracts that the company is considering pursuing, nor has he been tasked by the company with any lobbying responsibilities.")

Many, including Senator Richard Durbin, "are worried because we hear about no-bid contracts in the Katrina areas going to the same companies that they went to in Iraq without the kind of accountability that we have to demand," the Illinois Democrat told National Public Radio, a public radio network in the US. "

Building Bonanza

Boh Brothers, a $250 million company in New Orleans, was probably the first company to get a post-Katrina federal contract from the Army Corps of Engineers to patch the broken levees. Robert Boh says that he still has no idea how many people worked on the job and how much it cost, because all work was tracked on paper rather than by computer. "Last week we managed to get our computers out of our offices with the help of a crane on a nearby overpass," he told CorpWatch.

Normally contracts are supposed to be openly advertised for 30 days, but in an emergency government officials can cut this process to just two to three days through a limited bidding system to a few selected companies.

For example, the Boh Brothers contract for the repairing the I-10 "Twin Span" bridge over Lake Pontchartrain was bid, reviewed, and signed in record time. On Sept. 9, bids were opened at 1 p.m., reviewed and approved by 3:30 p.m. and the contract was signed by 5:15 p.m.

Boh is now working on a sub-contract with the Shaw Group of Baton Rouge, a $3 billion engineering company, which has a $100 million contract with the Corps to pump floodwaters out of New Orleans. Shaw also has a $100 million contract named "Operation Blue Roof" (after the blue-colored plastic tarpaulins used for temporary shelters) that was awarded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to provide housing and support services for displaced residents. (The Shaw Group has won at least $135.7 million in work in Iraq)

A similar fast-track system gave contracts for work in New Orleans to Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR), a subsidiary of Halliburton , a $20 billion company based in Houston, to "assess pumps and infrastructure in the city and construct a facility to support recovery efforts." In addition KBR has been asked to repair three Navy facilities in Mississippi including the Stennis Space Center. The work so far has included damage assessments, repairing roofs, and restoring power.The KBR contract, worth approximately $30 million, is part of a larger $500 million naval contract that was bid well in advance of the disaster. Signed in July 2004, this contract, called CONCAP (construction capabilities), is issued by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. This is KBR second CONCAP contract; the first included constructing prisons in Guantanamo Bay. CONCAP is very similar to the better known Army contract called Logistics Civilian Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) under which
Halliburton has done the bulk of its work in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Although CONCAP is a Navy contract, the Corps has taken advantage of it in the last two weeks to hire
Halliburton to build a temporary morgue and to pump water from Plaquemines Parish (south of New Orleans).

Asked why the Corps was using
Halliburton for this work without competitive bidding, Carol Sanders, a Corps spokeswoman, said: "Due to the magnitude of Hurricane Katrina and the urgent requirements for emergency response, the Corps was authorized to tap into the existing contracts of sister services."

Likewise a system of pre-bidding followed by limited bidding allowed AshBritt and Philips & Jordan to be dispatched right after the hurricane to clean up debris in the Gulf States: AshBritt of Pompano Beach, Florida, was hired to clean up Louisiana and Mississippi under a $150 million contract issued by the Corps in 2003. Phillips & Jordan of Nashville, Tennessee, holds a similar 2003 Corps contract for debris removal in Alabama and Florida. (Phillips & Jordan was also hired to remove debris from the World Trade Center, under a Corps program called "Advanced Contracting Initiatives")

These pre-existing contracts were replaced on Sept. 15 by the winners of a new limited bid competition the Corps conducted for debris removal. Each of these new contracts is worth up to $500 million, with an option to increase the ceiling another $500 million.

Not surprisingly, out of a pool of 22 candidates, the very same companies won the contracts. Ashbritt has been hired to clean up Mississippi, and Phillips & Jordan to remove debris in Louisiana. California-based Environmental Chemical Corporation and Ceres Environmental Services of Minnesota also won contracts in Louisiana.

Bechtel, a $17.4 billion San Francisco-based privately owned company, has also been selected by FEMA to provide short-term housing for people displaced by the hurricane. The company also worked on removing World Trade Center debris in New York and was the beneficiary of $2.8 billion in reconstruction contracts in Iraq.

Other well-connected companies include Fluor, of Aliso Viejo, California. Its work to set up a new Housing Area Command was approved under long-standing FEMA contracts that allow the agency to turn to Flour during disasters.

Fluor's team in the Gulf states is run by the same manager who was in charge of the company’s $1.5 billion in contracts in Iraq. "Our rebuilding work in Iraq is slowing down and this has made some people available to respond to our work in Louisiana," Fluor chief Alan Boeckmann told Reuters. The Los Angeles Times reports that the Fluor board member Suzanne Woolsey, wife of a former CIA director, is a trustee of Institute for Defense Analyses, a nonprofit corporation paid by the government to do research for the Pentagon.

Another engineering company working in the Gulf States under a pre-existing arrangement with FEMA is CH2MHill. The Denver, Colorado company also had a $28.5 million reconstruction contract in Iraq in 2004 and joint contract on a $12.7 million electrical power generation deal in Iraq.

While the contractors rake in the money, it is likely that the cash bonanza might not trickle down to their workers. On September 8, 2005, in the aftermath of
Hurricane Katrina , President Bush issued an executive order suspending 1931 Davis-Bacon law that requires federal contractors to pay prevailing wage.

Prioritizing the Budget

In Iraq, limited accountability, corruption, massive cost overruns, and devastating failures fed the chaotic mess that has followed the 2003 fall of Baghdad. Nonetheless, the largest Katrina contracts have been won by many of the same politically connected companies that oversaw that failed reconstruction. And it is perhaps no coincidence, since many of the same people in the Army Corps of Engineers are awarding them–and in much the same manner: as open-ended, no- or hastily bid contracts with guaranteed profit margins.

But before we look at the flawed contracting process that followed the destruction in the Gulf states, let's go back the decisions that made the flooding not only possible but inevitable. Let’s start with who decided what to spend on levees and waterworks around the country and what monies to cut from projects in Louisiana since 2001. The ultimate responsibility lies with the president who signed the national budget and with the members of Congress who debated and rewrote the plan that the White House draws up for them every February.

But three high-ranking men in Washington, DC, play a key role in presenting options to the White House and Congress. Until about a year ago, they were Marcus Peacock, associate director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for natural resource programs, John Woodley, assistant secretary of the Army for civil works and Lieutenant General Robert Flowers, then commander of the Army Corps of Engineers.

On April 28, 2004, the two senators from Louisiana met with Woodley and Peacock and asked them for more money for the state’s environmental restoration and water projects.

There are two major pools of money from which the Army Corps of Engineers draws for flood prevention in Louisiana. The first is the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, or SELA, which was approved following a massive rainstorm in May 1995 that killed six people. The second is the Louisiana Coastal Area Comprehensive Coastwide Ecosystem Restoration Study (LCA).

SELA has spent $430 million on shoring up levees and building pumping stations, with $50 million in local aid. Another $250 million in crucial projects remains unspent.

LCA, on the other hand, is only just getting started. It will ultimately take $1.9 billion over ten years to reverse the 30 percent loss in coastal lands that is making the southern Louisiana increasingly more vulnerable to floods. (This plan is significantly scaled back from the original proposal to spend $14 billion over 30 years.)

"The senators emphasized a need for support from the administration, not just passive inaction," said Sidney Coffee, who heads the Governor's Office of Coastal Activities in Louisiana. "They emphasized the need for financial support, and none came during this meeting."

Woodley himself acknowledged the necessity to cut costs-- and why--when he presented the budget earlier in the year. "This is a frugal budget that reflects the priorities of a nation at war," he stated.

The lack of support for these crucial waterworks was predictable. Woodley and Peacock are both political appointees tasked with implementing the White House priorities of cutting budgets and regulations rather than supporting environmentalists or engineers.

In a prior job at the Army, Woodley opposed environmental regulations on military bases. And Peacock was responsible for cutting money to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and instrumental in the Bush administration's decisions to freeze more than a dozen Clinton-era rules related to environment, health, and safety, including regulations on arsenic in drinking water, snowmobiles in national parks, and protections for roadless areas of national forests.

Diverted to Iraq

White House priorities were also reflected in the government’s failure to pay sufficient attention to the well-document danger of hurricanes to Louisiana. One possible reason that Gen. Flowers and his colleagues, were unable to focus on either SELA or LCA in 2003 and 2004, was because their attention was diverted to a more urgent White House request: the reconstruction of Iraq's oil fields, which involved everything from putting out oil fires during the invasion to trucking gasoline into Baghdad from Kuwait and Turkey.

When Katrina struck, resources were stretched. First there was the matter of the money. "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay," Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, told the Times-Picayune newspaper on June 8, 2004. "Nobody locally is happy that the levees can't be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us."

Corps commander Lieutenant General Carl Strock acknowledged that disaster was inevitable. In a Defense Department briefing on September 2, he said that "if a Category 4 or 5 hurricane were to strike New Orleans, this levee system could not be relied upon." Secondly, there was the matter of personnel. Two of Flowers' most senior staff were in Iraq: Brigadier-General Robert Crear and Strock (who went on to head the Corp after Flowers retired in 2004) spent a good chunk of 2003 working on Project Restore Iraqi Oil,
Halliburton ’s now-infamous no-bid contract.

As the chair of the February 26, 2003 Pentagon meeting at which this contract was drawn up, Strock attracted some notoriety. Less than three weeks after it was signed, he and Crear posed with
Halliburton crews for photo-ops at the Al Zubair oil fields in southern Iraq. For most of the rest of the year the two men worked in Baghdad and Basra, rather than Baton Rouge and Vicksburg.

Strock was one of the five people who voted at a September 1, 2003 secret meeting in Baghdad to pay
Halliburton $500 million out of Iraq's own funds for the no-bid RIO project. No Iraqis were present for the vote despite the fact that the money came from their own coffers.

When whistleblower Bunnatine Greenhouse revealed the details behind the no-bid contracts that
Halliburton had won in Iraq, Strock arranged to have her demoted, despite a string of excellent performance reviews in her 23 years of service. "Ms. Greenhouse's removal from the SES is based on her performance," Strock said, "and not in retaliation for any disclosures of alleged improprieties that she may have made."

(All told,
Halliburton has earned more than $12 billion in Iraq. Pentagon audits released by Democratic party in June showed $1.03 billion in "questioned" costs and $422 million in "unsupported" costs for Halliburton 's work in Iraq.)

Top experts on water management from Army Corps were similarly unavailable for domestic programs. Dr. Eugene Stakhiv, Jerry Webb, and Dr. Edwin Theriot to the Middle East were dispatched to help the Iraqi Ministry of Water Resources, as part of the "New Eden" project to restore the Mesopotamian Marshlands, which Saddam Hussein had drained.

Back in the Bayou

While Strock and Crear were re-building pipelines and restoring marshes in Iraq, the effort to prevent a disaster in New Orleans was floundering for lack of federal money and commitment. The time to fix the levees and restore the coastal marshes was rapidly running out.

Strock had returned to the US in late 2003 to run the Corps’ civil works programs including flood control and navigation and became commander in 2004. Crear--who had been in charge of the day-to-day operations of
Halliburton 's work in Iraq-- would run the Mississippi Valley Division that includes the levees in New Orleans.

The clock was quietly ticking on January 31, when in a deja vu moment, Crear and Roberts were re-united for a photo-op in Baton Rouge to sign an agreement with Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco to finalize years of work on the Louisiana Coastal Area Comprehensive Coastwide Ecosystem Restoration Study.

The Corps inability to foresee and plan for problems in the wake of Katrina was deja vu all over again. After returning to the US, Crear testified to Congress on June 15, 2004 that when working with KBR in Iraq, it was his "mission in the Department of Defense to secure the oil. ... However, what we found was not oil well fires but significant damage due to looting. It was estimated to be about $1.4 billion overall damage and about 85 percent of that due to looting."

Two and a half years after Strock and Crear posed in the Iraqi oil fields, and seven months after the men posed for the Baton Rouge photo, the threat of Katrina again challenged the Army Corps of Engineers. And again it was slow off the mark. On August 29, as the federal government struggled to respond, Katrina destroyed New Orleans and devastated a massive area.

But putting aside the slow response to disaster, the question remains: Could the disaster have been predicted and prevented?

As for prevention, experts say that even if Louisiana had gotten full funding in 2003 and 2004, the levees would still have collapsed. The Corps' own engineering schemes over the last 70 years turned a "serpentine river into a straight one." The destruction of a natural landscape that could have checked the devastating floods increased the likelihood and severity of disaster.

Joe Ballard who ran the Corps from 1996 to 2000 and grew up in New Orleans does not blame it for failing to prevent the damage. The Corps, he says, has been struggling unsuccessfully to get more funding from the Congress and the White House to pay for corrective work. "It pains me to see the finger pointed because I know what a juggling act the Corps has to play," he said.

The failure to predict the disaster and prepare an effective evacuation plan is another matter. Despite President’s Bush statement that "I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees," Ballard told CorpWatch that there was no way that the Corps did not know that a major flood was possible. "We were walking whistling past the graveyard." he said.

Today, Strock and Crear are back in the saddle at the Corps overseeing emergency contracts in the aftermath of
Hurricane Katrina , in collaboration with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Navy. Chief among these contractors are companies such as Halliburton and Bechtel, which have been awarded pre-bid, limited bid, and sometimes no-bid contracts to assess the damage, provide emergency shelters and fix the infrastructure. (see box)

Marcus Peacock is no longer at OMB. He is now deputy administrator of the EPA, the very agency whose budget he helped slash in the early days of the Bush administration. And Robert Flowers has taken a job as chief executive officer of the federal contracts subsidiary of HNTB, an engineering company in Kansas City, Missouri, that builds airport facilities, bridges, and you guessed it: levees.

Will we see the same over-charging and failed projects that characterized Corps projects in Iraq? Only time will tell, but on September 15, an important step was taken to track the problem if it occurs: the creation of a special inspector general at the Department of Homeland Security to investigate corruption and fraud in post-Katrina contracts.

The same day Senators Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut and Susan Collins of Maine introduced a bill in Congress that calls for the expansion of the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction to include oversight of the spending in the Gulf Coast recovery. The two senators said using an existing office was preferable because it would be able to begin work quickly.

In a September 15 speech to the nation, Bush said that Americans "have every right to expect a more effective response in a time of emergency."

But the track record of private contractors and federal agencies in Iraq and now in the Gulf states bodes ill for the likelyhood that the public will enjoy that right. The Corps contracts and those awarded FEMA replicate "the same flawed contracting strategy that produced disastrous results in Iraq," Conresssman Seny Hoyer wrote to the Government Accountability Office.

"Where the train runs off the tracks is when politics become part of the decision-making process," says Ballard.

Re: More on No-Bid Contracting

August 23RD, 2007

For ’06 storms, FEMA already has contracts in place
By STEPHEN LOSEY
June 15, 2006
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has prepared for this year’s hurricane season by lining up many more contracts to respond to disaster than it did last year.
The agency has more than 80 contracts with companies to provide hurricane relief, Deirdre Lee, FEMA’s deputy director of operations and chief acquisition officer, said in a June 7 interview. That is a marked contrast from 2005, when the agency had only four pre-awarded contracts.
The dearth of agreements left FEMA unprepared and poorly supplied for Hurricane Katrina. After the storm hit last year, FEMA awarded four companies no-bid contracts worth a combined $2 billion: Fluor Corp., the Shaw Group, Bechtel and CH2M Hill.
FEMA was roundly criticized for relying on no-bid contracts after Katrina, among many other aspects of its response to the storm. Its lack of supplies also contributed to its flat-footed reaction.

FEMA is still working on bidding those contracts. Pat English, head of contracting for FEMA, said that elements of the agreements have been bid, and the agency should be finished bidding them by mid-July.
FEMA is now contracting for supplies that survivors of a hurricane or other disaster will need, such as meals ready to eat, water, medical supplies, generators, plastic sheeting and tarps. It is contracting for base camps and lining up engineers who can assess the stability of roads, bridges, buildings and other infrastructure. And it is negotiating contracts to buy, haul and install mobile homes and trailers after a disaster. The agency hopes those agreements will be in place by mid-July.
That is greatly broadened from last year, when the four preawarded contracts provided only for housing inspections, help desk services, hazard mitigation and infrastructure assessments.
“We’ve made great strides,” English said. The importance of arranging contracts before disaster strikes “is one of the lessons we learned from Katrina,” she said.
FEMA is not greatly changing its contracting methods, English said, but it is expanding its scope. FEMA has doubled its number of contracting officers and specialists from about 30 to 65 in the last year and hopes to fill another 60 vacancies, she said.
Not only is FEMA arranging more contracts, but it is signing larger contracts. For example, English said FEMA’s housing inspection contract from 2005 only provided for about 400,000 inspections, but the agency learned it needed far more. This year’s contract covers 800,000 inspections, English said.
FEMA also doubled the number of infrastructure inspections contracted.
The increasing number and size of the contracts will require more oversight from FEMA once disaster strikes and the agreements are activated.
FEMA spokesman Michael Widomski said the agency’s plans to “surge” — or temporarily increase its ranks to respond to a disaster — will let it hire more contracting officers to handle its contracts. Added oversight will be especially important if disasters strike nearly simultaneously in different areas.
FEMA has had surge plans in the past, Widomski said, but is lining up more potential hires this year. FEMA now has between 20 and 30 potential temporary contracting officers and specialists on call and hopes to bring that number up to 60.
The Government Accountability Office criticized FEMA in a March report for failing to coordinate its contracting with the General Services Administration. That lack of cooperation meant neither agency knew who was overseeing contracts for hotels, base camps and ambulances worth $120 million.
Lee said FEMA and GSA are working more closely together and communicating more so each agency knows its roles and responsibilities in the contracting process. FEMA is conducting similar conversations with other agencies to “fine-tune” interagency cooperation.
E-mail: slosey@federaltimes.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Water Deal Exposes Secret Iraq Contracts
By KATHERINE SHRADER and ALLISON HOFFMAN, Associated Press Writers
Tuesday, February 6, 2007

(02-06) 11:22 PST WASHINGTON, (AP) --
CIA officers operating in northern Iraq bought drinking water from a bottling plant there for years prior to the 2003 invasion that ousted Saddam Hussein.
That changed soon afterward. A CIA officer handling logistics for the Middle East and other regions recommended that an American company provide water and other supplies, according to former government officials.
The U.S. contractor that benefited from the multimillion-dollar deal wasn't just anyone. The company had personal ties to the officer, Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, who would soon leave his logistics post in Frankfurt, Germany, and move to Washington to become the CIA's third-ranking official.
In at least one written communication, a Baghdad CIA officer complained about the no-bid contract. According to one official, the officer believed the deal was simply unnecessary because safe water was available commercially but he was ignored.
The water contract, while small on the scale of the billions that flowed into Iraq, raises questions about why U.S. taxpayer dollars went to well-connected businessmen rather than Iraqis who could have benefited from a share of postwar reconstruction business. And the case provides a window into the murky world of covert government business arrangements.
Foggo retired from the CIA last year. He is now at the center of a federal investigation, nearing completion, into whether he improperly steered contracts to companies controlled by his best friend, San Diego defense contractor Brent Wilkes.
Federal prosecutors in San Diego are preparing to seek indictments against Foggo and Wilkes on charges of honest services fraud and conspiracy, two government officials familiar with the investigation told The Associated Press last week.
Those officials and others spoke on condition that they not be identified because the charges have not been finalized and because CIA contracting is classified. Justice Department and law enforcement officials in San Diego and Washington declined to comment.
Honest services fraud is a charge combining mail and wire fraud often used in public corruption cases involving officials who have engaged in a pattern of improper activities, such as accepting gifts, trips or promises of future employment from private individuals.
The probe of Foggo and Wilkes stems from a broader federal investigation involving at least five federal agencies into how associates of former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham directed government business to a favored network of national security contractors. Cunningham, a San Diego Republican elected to eight terms in Congress, is currently serving more than eight years in jail for taking at least $2.4 million in bribes. Another defense contractor has pleaded guilty to paying some of them.
In June 2002, Wilkes created a government contractor called Archer Defense Technologies, which was registered to the address of his flagship, Wilkes Corp., in Poway, Calif. The company also used the name Liberty Defense Technologies. At the beginning of 2004, his nephew and apprentice, Joel Combs, formed a new company called Archer Logistics, run out of a small Virginia office.
Despite the short history of Wilkes' company, Foggo recommended that the CIA buy water from it, current and former officials said. He was a supervising officer at the CIA supply hub in Germany, and the purchasing officer there went along.
Foggo didn't tell the purchasing officer about his personal ties to Combs or Wilkes, a government official says. With CIA officers literally under fire and other large issues to deal with, the CIA station didn't put up a fight, former officials say.
The issue in the investigation isn't the price but that the contract was awarded without competitive bidding and that Foggo had an obligation to disclose his personal connections, according to these officials.
Foggo's former attorney publicly acknowledged before he died last summer that the investigation includes Archer, but he said his client had no idea that the company was associated with Wilkes. Foggo's current attorney, Mark MacDougall, declined to comment, as did Wilkes' attorney, Mark Geragos.
CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield declined to comment citing the investigation, which includes the spy agency's inspector general. "As a rule, we don't comment publicly about which firms may or may not have a contractual relationship with the agency," he said.
From the beginning of the Iraq invasion, the CIA was forced almost constantly to revise its game plan. Early predictions were that the CIA station set up in Baghdad would move to a peacekeeping mission by fall of 2003 and need less than 100 officers, with the Army handling most key functions.
Instead, the CIA had a station of more than 500 that fall, the former officials said. Sorting out where the water came from had never been a top priority, they recalled.
A veteran officer who served in Central America, Foggo rose through the ranks to become a leading logistics officer for the CIA based in Frankfurt, one of a few CIA bases of its kind in the world. In that position, he handled shipments of supplies on C-130 cargo planes to nearly a third of the CIA's overseas operations — outfits in Central Europe, Africa, the Balkans and the Middle East that required everything from food and water to phones and computers.
Foggo, 52, was described as a guy who could get things done. When the U.S.-led coalition invaded Iraq in 2003, Foggo was in charge of ensuring CIA personnel in the war zone had what they needed, including bottled water.
The officials say the CIA turned to Foggo's friends, including Wilkes and his nephew, Combs. Wilkes, also 52, was Foggo's best friend from high school, and the two football teammates named their sons after each other. Combs used an address at an office park called Thunderbolt Place in Chantilly, Va., which was also used by other Wilkes' companies. The space in a two-story brick office park has now been vacated.
The review of the logistics operations in Iraq did not begin until after Foggo had been tapped by then-CIA Director Porter Goss to be the agency's No. 3 — the executive director — who would run the agency's day-to-day operations.
Such a significant promotion for a logistics officer came as a surprise to many in the agency.
Observers said Foggo embraced the role. He started sending out memos to agency personnel, signed "Yours in Service." He had a nickname for everyone, and he could be seen glad-handing his way through lunch at the CIA's seventh-floor executive dining room.
He and Wilkes also dined at a Washington steakhouse at the foot of Capitol Hill frequented by lobbyists, which caught the attention of a House Intelligence Committee investigator looking into ties between defense contractors and Cunningham. Foggo and Wilkes kept a private wine locker at the restaurant stocked with Cunningham's favorite, a pricey California cabernet.
The meteoric rise ended with a crash.
Foggo retired from the agency in May under investigation by five agencies: the FBI, the IRS, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the CIA's inspector general and the U.S. attorney's office in San Diego. A local news helicopter circled his house in the Northern Virginia suburbs as agents sifted through his belongings.
Wilkes' business and personal fortunes have also suffered. In the past two months, his wife has filed for divorce, and he has defaulted on a $7.5 million personal mortgage loan. His company, the Wilkes Corp., defaulted on $12.1 million owed on another note.
____
Associated Press writer Allison Hoffman reported from San Diego.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Chinese Military Handed No-Bid Contract On Key US Security Infrastructure
Media omit fact that Hutchinson Whampoa is an arm of the red dragon
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | March 27 2006
The Associated Press reported last week that Hutchison Whampoa Ltd was given a no-bid contract by the US government to take over radiation detecting security just 65 miles away from Freeport in the Bahamas with no oversight. Hutchinson Whampoa is admittedly a holding of the Chinese navy and the People's Liberation Army.
The US government has handed a no-bid contract directly to the Chinese military machine to handle key security infrastructure right as that country gears up for a future confrontation with America.
From Newsmax, "According to a 1999 investigative report by the American Foreign Policy Council, "Hutchison Whampoa, through its Hutchison International Terminals [HIT] subsidiary or Panama Ports Company, has substantial links to the Chinese communist government and the People's Liberation Army.
"The Panama Ports Company is 10 percent owned by China Resources Enterprise [CRE], which is the commercial arm of China's Ministry of Trade and Economic Co-operation. In its investigation into China's attempts to influence the 1996 U.S. presidential campaign, the U.S. Senate Government Affairs Committee identified CRE as a conduit for ‘espionage - economic, political and military - for China.’ Committee Chairman Senator Fred Thompson said that CRE has ‘geopolitical purposes. Kind of like a smiling tiger; it might look friendly, but it's very dangerous.’”
Sen. Trent Lott has described the Hong Kong firm as "an arm of the People's Liberation Army."
"The company is headed by a Li Ka-Shing (pictured below) , the chairman of Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. Intelligence sources say he has deep connections with the Chinese Communist government."
Hutchison Whampoa owns ports all over the world and many charge that the Chinese are using the company to encircle the world in preparation for retaliation to opposition of China's intended invasion of Taiwan.
In 1997 the Communist Chinese government took over the Long Beach Naval Air Base, the only major deep water port that can take large ships on the west coast. In 2000, the Communist Chinese, Hutchinson Whampoa which is run by the PLA, took over the Panama Canal and has stationed between 15,000 and 30,000 troops at the facility.
In 1997 the Chinese were caught bringing in heroin, RPG's and 3,000 AK-47's via Long Beach.
We remind our readers that top Chinese generals continue to threaten nuclear attacks on America.
Alex Jones' first documentary film America: Destroyed By Design, made in 1997, warned Americans that the sell-out to the Chinese was the first step on the road to the sacking of the American economy and pulling the plug on key US infrastructure.
Click here to view a segment where Alex Jones discusses the Chinese sell-out.
It is a stated goal of the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission and the CFR to promote what they call 'interdependence' and to lobby governments to sell off key infrastructure such as roads, lakes, ports, and highways to international corporations so that corporations can grow to be bigger in size than government.
As a country we are not just being robbed of our ability to create wealth, we are being robbed of our infrastructure, our land and our capacity to work the land. Your currency, your future and your sovereignty is systematically being dismantled, looted and sold to the highest bidder.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Army No-Bid Contracts

Army reassigns official who criticized Halliburton deal

WASHINGTON (AP) — A high-ranking Army Corps of Engineers official who publicly criticized the Pentagon's decision to award Halliburton Co. a no-bid contract for work in Iraq has been demoted, officials said Monday.

The Army Corps of Engineers reassigned Bunnatine Greenhouse, who criticized an Iraq contract for Halliburton.

By Yuri Gripan, AP

Posted 8/29/2005 12:07 PM     Updated 8/29/2005 1:46 PM

Bunnatine H. Greenhouse, who had been the Corps of Engineers' top procurement official since 1997, was removed, effective Saturday, for what Corps of Engineers officials called a poor job performance. Her lawyer, however, said her removal constitutes "blatant discrimination" and violates an earlier agreement with the Army to suspend her demotion until "a sufficient record" pertaining to her complaints is complete.

"The failure to abide by prior commitments and the circumstances surrounding Ms. Greenhouse's removal are the hallmark of illegal retaliation," her attorney, Michael D. Kohn, wrote in the letter to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

"Her removal will send a message to all concerned that if they dare stand up to corrupting influences within the Army contracting world their careers will be destroyed," he added.

Greenhouse was reassigned to a lesser job in the Corps of Engineers and removed from the Senior Executive Service, the top rank of civilian government employees.

Rumsfeld's chief spokesman, Lawrence Di Rita, referred questions about the Greenhouse matter to the Army.

Carol Sanders, a spokeswoman for the Corps of Engineers, did not immediately return phone calls seeking comment.

Kris Kolesnik, executive director of the National Whistleblower Center, which is advising Greenhouse on contacts with members of Congress and the news media, said in an interview that Kohn was informed by the Pentagon's Inspector General's office that it is still preparing a report based on Greenhouse's allegations.

Greenhouse went public last year with her criticism of Iraq-related work awarded to Halliburton by the Corps of Engineers. Her main objection was the issuance to Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root of a no-bid, five-year contract to restore Iraqi oil fields shortly before the Iraq war began in 2003.

Yet More on No-Bid Contracting

PIRRO STEERED D.A. CONTRACT TO KERIK

By FREDRIC U. DICKER State Editor , New York Post

October 5, 2006 -- ALBANY - While she was Westchester district attorney, Jeanine Pirro steered a no-bid contract to Bernard Kerik and Rudy Giuliani's security firm, rebuffing protests about the arrangement, The Post has learned.

The 2004 contract was ordered despite Pirro being warned by a lawyer in the DA's Office that it might be illegal or unethical to award a contract in that way. It also came in the face of protests over the cost of the deal by the private company that had to pay Kerik and Giuliani, a source close to the case told The Post.

"Jeanine insisted that Kerik get the contract. She was working hard to do favors for him," said the source.

Pirro's awarding of the business to the firm, known as Giuliani/Kerik, a subsidiary of Giuliani Partners, came a little over a year before she turned to him for a favor - to find out if her husband, Al, was cheating on her.

Kerik, who by that time had left Giuliani to set up his own security company, had Al Pirro tailed and discussed with Jeanine planting a bug on his boat. There is now a federal investigation over possible illegal wiretapping.

Kerik discouraged Jeanine Pirro from the bugging because it might be illegal and she says she never followed through with it.

The contract with Giuliani/Kerik was entered into by A & P, the supermarket chain, as part of deal with Pirro's office to allow the company to settle a criminal charge resulting from the illegal sale of alcoholic beverages to minors.

The company, fearing a conviction could endanger its right to sell alcoholic beverages in other states, agreed to a plea bargain. The charge would eventually be dropped if A & P hired an independent private-sector inspector general, or IPSIG, to monitor its policies for restricting sales to minors.

Pirro directed that Kerik was the one who must be hired for the job, the source told The Post.

But during talks over the selection of the inspector general, one of the lawyers representing A & P, Kathleen Plunkett O'Connor, objected that the firm was very expensive, the source said.

The cost of the contract with Giuliani/Kerik could not be learned last night.

The source said that because of the expense of Giuliani/Kerik, the lawyer for A & P wanted to know if the supermarket giant could hire another firm to do the work or if the contract could be put out to bid.

But Pirro would have none of it - and again demanded that Kerik get the contract, saying otherwise there would be no deal, the source explained.

Pirro said that O'Connor should be told that the DA had put the contract out to bid, the source continued. Reached by The Post, O'Connor confirmed that she had worked on the A & P case but repeatedly refused to discuss specifics.

Pirro, who has described Kerik in recent days as a friend, conceded to The Post that she directed A & P to hire Giuliani/Kerik.

"In order to guarantee that A & P met her high standards, she wanted to use a best-in-class firm to monitor A & P's compliance with the law," said her spokesman, John Gallagher.

"Like many others around the world, she selected Rudy Giuliani and Bernard Kerik's firm for this purpose," he added.

Another Pirro spokesman, responding to specific questions from The Post, also contended that Pirro had directed the assistant district attorney handling the case "to seek quotes from several other firms to make sure that Giuliani's price was competitive."

But The Post's source - who has provided detailed knowledge of the case - insisted that no such request for price quotes was ever made.

During her 12 years as DA, Pirro only once directed that an outside monitor be hired in a case - and that was Giuliani/Kerik, her spokesman said.

Pirro's selection of Giuliani/Kerik to serve as the A & P monitor is in sharp contrast to the practice of Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, whose office pioneered the use of independent inspector generals.

Morgenthau's office, which has used IPSIGs about 50 times in recent years, directs that companies choose their own monitors, as long as they meet professional standards.

"We think it is a conflict for us to impose a particular monitor on a business," said Daniel Castleman, chief of Morgenthau's investigations division, speaking generally and not about the Pirro case.

"We think the appearance of that is problematic, if it appeared we were picking our friends or former colleagues, that is not an appearance we want," Castleman added.

Castleman said another reason for not forcing a company to hire a favored monitor is that "some are more expensive than others."

Manhattan lawyer Neil Getnick, president of the International Association of IPSIGs, said law-enforcement agencies usually identify qualified monitors by issuing "requests for proposals" or "requests for qualifications" from companies providing such services.

"The important thing is for the governmental agency to go through a fair and open selection process," he said.

A & P didn't return calls seeking comment. Kerik's lawyer, Joseph Tacopina, refused to comment.

Sunny Mindel, a spokesman for Giuliani Partners, called the size of the contract "relatively small" but would not reveal the amount and she said Giuliani wasn't aware that Pirro had personally directed that his firm be hired.

Pirro's crackdown on A & P came after a series of highly publicized accidents and incidents in which underage intoxicated Westchester youths were hurt or killed.

"Jeanine wanted to make it clear that her office was responding to the problem and A & P was a case where she wanted to make an example," the source said.

fredric.dicker@nypost.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

FEMA goes back on pledge to reopen no-bid contracts for Katrina recovery work

WASHINGTON -- The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broken its promise to reopen four multimillion-dollar no-bid contracts for Hurricane Katrina work, including three that federal auditors say wasted significant amounts of money.

Officials said they awarded the four contracts in October to speed recovery efforts that might have been slowed by competitive bidding. Some critics, however, suggested they were rewards for politically connected firms.

R. David Paulison, acting FEMA director, pledged last fall to rebid the contracts, which were awarded to Shaw Group Inc., Bechtel Corp., CH2M Hill Inc., and Fluor Corp. Later, the agency acknowledged the rebidding wouldn't happen until February.

This week, FEMA said the contracts wouldn't be rebid after all. In fact, they have been extended, in part because of good performance, said Michael Widomski, a FEMA spokesman.

''They are continuing the work," Widomski said, and the agency is now focused on competitive bids for disaster relief contracts for the next hurricane season, beginning June 1.

''We looked at the lessons learned from Katrina," Widomski said. ''We're painstakingly looking at what best fits the needs of disaster victims and taking bids for future work."

An additional $1.5 billion in work promised to small businesses also has yet to be awarded.

A review by the Government Accountability Office of 13 major contracts said last week the government had wasted millions of dollars, due mostly to poor planning by FEMA.

Among the 13 were three of the four no-bid contracts for temporary housing, worth up to $500 million each, that went to three major firms with extensive government ties.

The preliminary review did not address the validity of no-bid contracts issued immediately after the Aug. 29 storm. The fourth housing contractor, Shaw Group, was not included in the audit.

Shaw Group's lobbyist, Joe Allbaugh, is a former FEMA director and a friend of President Bush. Riley Bechtel, Bechtel CEO, served on Bush's Export Council from 2003 to 2004, and CH2M Hill Inc. and Fluor Corp. have done extensive work for the government in the past.

The companies have rebutted allegations that political connections played a factor. ''Our work was awarded based on performance," said Brad Jones, spokesman for CH2M Hill, which is based in Englewood, Colo.

The latest disclosure has brought complaints from some lawmakers, who say the Bush administration has not done enough for small businesses. Democrats, in particular, have urged limits on no-bid contracts, which they say are unfairly handed to large companies with political connections.

A House panel chaired by Representative Tom Davis, Republican of Virginia, plans to hold at least one hearing next month on Katrina contracting. That was announced after the GAO's audit results were released.

''The administration has promised to help local and small businesses get contracts to help rebuild the Gulf Coast, but they keep letting them down," said Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.

FEMA had promised in October to boost the number of contracts given to small and minority businesses, partly by setting aside up to $1.5 billion worth of work to maintain trailers housing Katrina evacuees. It said those contracts would be awarded by Feb. 1.

Yet those 15 contracts -- eight of which are designated for minority-owned businesses -- have yet to be awarded because of the high volume of applications, according to Widomski. He said the agency hoped to announce the winners by early next month.

On Oct. 6, Paulison pledged in a congressional hearing to reopen the four deals. But after the firms contended that they hadn't been told, officials with the Homeland Security Department -- which oversees FEMA -- pushed the timeframe back to February.

Widomski said FEMA now will allow the four major firms to complete their Katrina work.

U.S. to correct no-bid contract abuses

Published: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2005

WASHINGTON: U.S. government contracts for Hurricane Katrina recovery efforts that were handed out with little or no competition will be rebid to prevent any waste or abuse, the acting FEMA director, R. David Paulison, said Thursday.

"I've been a public servant for a long time, and I've never been a fan of no-bid contracts," Paulison told a Senate panel investigating the Federal Emergency Management Agency's response to the hurricane.

"Sometimes you have to do them because of the expediency of getting things done."

"And I can assure that you we are going to look at all of those contracts very carefully," he added.

"All of those no-bid contracts, we are going to go back and rebid," he said of pacts that were worth millions of dollars.

In

the weeks after the storm, more than 80 percent of at least $1.5 billion in FEMA contracts were awarded with little or no competition, or had open-ended or vague terms that previous audits have cited as being highly prone to abuse.

Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security Committee, questioned whether FEMA should look at having contracts for services - including housing and supplies - already in place before a disaster strikes.

"It sure looks with hindsight that FEMA would have been in a much better position if it had had a lot of contracts in place that had been bid that were standby contracts to provide exactly the kind of services that FEMA rushed in to provide on a no-bid basis - and which we fear the taxpayers may have ended up paying more money for than they should have," said Lieberman.

"Hopefully we can put things in place for the future where we won't have to depend on no-bid contracts for future use," Paulison said.

The FEMA chief was one of a bevy of Bush administration officials appearing before a half-dozen hearings to update Congress about the government's long- and short-term concerns in Katrina's aftermath.

Housing assistance is a top priority as the administration grapples with finding homes for evacuated victims.

Bush Buddies Get No-Bid Contracts While Workers Get the Shaft

Sept. 14—Some of the first large-scale Hurricane Katrina relief and recovery contracts awarded by the Bush administration were awarded on a no-bid basis to corporations with strong ties to the administration and the Republican Party, according to news stories in The Wall Street Journal and other media. At the same time, the administration is using the catastrophe to push a reactionary anti-worker agenda, gutting federal regulations that protect worker safety and ensure quality work and living wages.

The no-bid deals include $100 million contracts to the Fluor Corp., a major donor to the GOP, and the Shaw Group, which is client of Joe M. Allbaugh, President George W. Bush’s campaign manager in 2000 and the former director the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

Meanwhile Halliburton Co., subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root Services received a $29.8 million clean-up contract, while Halliburton, formerly run by Vice President Dick Cheney, is doing repair work at three Navy facilities in Mississippi under an existing contract. The company also has been awarded billions of dollars of federal contracts for work in Iraq and that work and the Bush administration’s Iraq procurement policies have been heavily criticized in recent years.

Bush Cuts Workers’ Wages, Suspends Safety Regulations

The Bush administration also is using the disaster to attack federal standards ensuring quality work and worker safety. Last week, the administration announced it was eliminating the high-quality work standards set by the federal Davis-Bacon law for hurricane reconstruction contracts work, allowing contractors to pay substandard wages to construction workers in the affected areas, and the administration also is lifting many affirmative action rules for reconstruction contracts.

Bush now wants to suspend wage supports for service workers in the hurricane zone as it did for construction workers on federal contracts last week, according to The Washington Post.

The administration also has suspended regulations limiting the number of hours truckers can drive when transporting fuel. In addition, Bush has weakened restrictions giving contracting preferences to small and minority-owned businesses and has suspended the Jones Act, which requires transport of petroleum, gasoline and other petroleum products on U.S.-flagged ships while operating in U.S. coastal waters.

The no-bid contracts “guarantee profits regardless of how much those companies spend or waste,” says AFT President Edward J. McElroy. “This is happening at the same time that the local hires of these firms will, in many cases, not earn a living wage. It is unconscionable that our national government would act to hurt those most in need while delivering a windfall to wealthy contractors. These decisions must be reversed.”

Bush Handling of Federal Contracts ‘Costly Mismanagement’

House Democratic leaders have requested that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigate the hurricane reconstruction deals.

In a letter to the GAO, Democrats wrote: “The history of this administration’s handling of federal contracts is one of persistent and costly mismanagement. Oversight of federal contracts has been turned over to private companies with blatant conflicts of interest. In Iraq, billions have been appropriated for the reconstruction effort, yet oil and electricity production remain below prewar levels.…The contracting strategy adopted by the administration suppressed competition on thousands of reconstruction projects, while favored companies like Halliburton received special treatment and lucrative monopoly contracts.”

During a tour of hurricane-ravaged Mississippi, the Rev. Jesse Jackson slammed the no-bid deals.

“We still got families that don’t know if people are dead or missing. While the disconnected and the needy are running from shelter to shelter, the connected and greedy are getting FEMA contracts.…It’s almost like white-collar looting,” he said.   

Defense Dept's No-Bid Contracts

Bob Geiger.com

Report: Defense Department's No-Bid Contracts Put "Troops In Iraq At Risk"
A study completed in late June by the Pentagon's Inspector General concludes that the Department of Defense (DoD) has risked the lives of U.S. troops in Iraq due to malfeasance in awarding and monitoring contracts for badly-needed armored vehicles.

The study, which was requested by Democratic Congresswoman Louise Slaughter of New York, found that since 2000 the DoD has awarded "sole-source" contracts valued at $2.2 billion to just two companies, Force Protection, Inc.(FPI) and Armor Holdings, Inc (AHI).

Inspector General auditors found that the Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) made these two companies the sole providers of armored vehicles and armor kits for troops, despite knowing that other suppliers may have produced the equipment so desperately needed in Iraq substantially faster. Both manufacturers fell far behind delivery schedules, while AHI also produced inadequate and faulty equipment.

"We determined the MCSC justification for awarding the sole-source contracts was questionable because MCSC officials knew that viable competition was available and were aware of significant concerns with FPI’s delivery capability," said the report about the MCSC's rationale for looking at no suppliers other than FPI. "In addition, Marine Corps officials did not pursue competition as contracts continued to be awarded, which raises concerns about the recurring justification for urgency."

"The Marine Corps Systems Command continued to award contracts for armored vehicles to Force Protection, Inc., even though Force Protection, Inc., did not perform as a responsible contractor and repeatedly failed to meet contractual delivery schedules for getting vehicles to the theater," the report continued.

Representative Slaughter has long been active in pursuing explanations for why equipment shortages have dogged American forces in Iraq and she kicked off this lengthy study of military procurement with a letter to the Inspector General in April 2006.

"I am concerned with the DoD's procurement history for armored vehicles," wrote Slaughter in the letter. "As with body armor, the DoD failed at the outset of the Iraq war to equip our troops with the armored vehicles to protect them from improvised explosive devices (IEDs)."

And Slaughter responded on Wednesday to the report's findings, which shine a bright spotlight on how no-bid defense contracts are one of the reasons the troops have fared so poorly under the Bush administration.

"This report indicates that contracts were given to companies that were unable to deliver vital equipment to our soldiers in the field, unnecessarily putting their lives at risk. These sole-source contracts were handed out even though serious questions were being raised at the time about the wisdom of such decisions.

"The Inspector General found that Armored Holdings sent cracked equipment that had been painted over, and even two left doors for the same vehicle, instead of one right and one left. Furthermore, FPI was unable to meet production deadlines even after the Pentagon paid $6.7 million to build up their capability. It was completely unacceptable.

"Our troops were put in harm's way by delayed and faulty equipment that was let into the system by questionable contracts. For the sake of our troops in the field, now and in the future, we need to learn more about who knew what, and why military officials who were aware of other competitors were overruled."
The report also noted significant problems with the up-armor kits manufactured by AHI subsidiary, Simula, and said that the DoD did not review and verify the company's production capabilities and quality control processes before awarding the no-bid contract. Military officials could not provide documentation of any market research or investigation of Simula’s production to support sole-sourcing the contract to that company.

Simula failed to deliver approximately 34 percent of the kits in accordance with contract delivery schedule. The DoD issued 64 corrective action requests to Simula documenting discrepancies found in the kits.

“The increase kit installation time, the addition re-inspection of kits in theater, and the late deliveries increased risks to soldiers’ lives," wrote the Inspector General of the situation with faulty armor kits.

The Inspector General's study also found that "survivability performance characteristics" so important to armored vehicles used in combat, were not known for the FPI products before that company was given an exclusive contract to produce the equipment for American troops.

"MCSC officials did not provide any documentation to support the survivability performance characteristics of the Cougar [vehicle]," the report said. "Given that this was the first contract with FPI for this vehicle, we do not believe such data existed, and it could not be provided by MCSC officials to justify a sole-source award."

Slaughter says the whole mess is not surprising and raises far more questions than answers.

"I want to know if there is more influence-peddling involved" in awarding the contracts without competition," said the New York Democrat. "We have to make sure a lesson was learned here."

"It's been business as usual. The lives of our soldiers took a back seat to who got the contracts."

No-Bid Contracts: The Pentagon and SAIC

A blueprint for a nation

The Pentagon leans on San Diego's SAIC in rebuilding Iraq; the sole-source contracts are lucrative and controversial

By Dean Calbreath
STAFF WRITER

July 4, 2004

CRISTINA MARTINEZ / Union-Tribune


As U.S. soldiers gathered in the Kuwaiti desert for their assault on Baghdad 15 months ago, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz was hastily pulling together about 150 Iraqi exiles to plan a new government for when Saddam Hussein fell.

Under a $33 million contract from the Pentagon, the exiles were placed on the payroll of Science Applications International Corp. The San Diego company flew them to Washington, D.C., leased apartments for them in Northern Virginia and set them up in a heavily guarded office building not far from the Pentagon, where they sketched blueprints for a new Iraq.

Once Baghdad fell, SAIC began flying the exiles back to Iraq. As members of the newly formed Iraqi Reconstruction and Development Council, or IRDC, the exiles were stationed in key government positions while still on SAIC's payroll.

Even after last week's transition to a new homegrown government in Iraq, many of those exiles hold power today, ranging from the telecommunications minister to governor of the war-torn province of Najaf.

The IRDC project is a prime example of the behind-the-scenes role SAIC has played in rebuilding post-Saddam Iraq.

Since the war began, SAIC has been awarded contracts to help train Iraqi soldiers and police officers, reshape the oil industry, rebuild the prison system, advise on democracy, act as liaison with the United Nations and analyze intelligence.

SAIC contracts with the Pentagon for Iraq

Work by SAIC's subcontractors range from creating an Iraqi TV network to advising Iraqis on how to set up a democracy.

Contract / total value including options / Current value / Projects

Iraqi media $82,350,557 $82,350,557 Created Iraq's first post-Saddam TV network

Program management $41,324,597 $20,662,298 Monitored how contractors perform their work

Iraqi expatriates (IRDC) $33,348,742 $24,811,853 Brought 150 Iraqi advisors to the occupation government

Democracy advisors $834,784 $235,231 Hired three advisors to talk to Iraqis about governance

Oil consultants $745,261 $532,458 Hired VIPs from Exxon Mobil and SAIC to advise on oil

Intelligence analysis $394,000 $201,011 Hired Washington military analyst to advise occupation

UN liaison $218,857 $84,628 Hired ex-U.S. ambassador to coordinate relief work

Industrial consultant $87,461 $87,461 Hired ex-U.S. ambassador to help revamp industries

Source: The Coalition Provisional Authority of Iraq

SAIC even launched and ran Iraq's first post-Saddam television network, although that task – under an $82 million contract headed by the Pentagon's psychological warfare division – ended last December amid complaints that the network was mainly a propaganda tool for the occupying forces.

SAIC declined to comment on its work in Iraq.

"Our executives refrain from comment out of concern for the security of our other forces over there," spokesman Jared Adams said.

SAIC's work in Iraq bolstered a bottom line that has become increasingly reliant on government contracts.

SAIC's government-related revenue hit $5.4 billion last year – a $1 billion jump from the previous year. The government work, which included other defense and homeland security work as well as work in Iraq, made up for a decline in civilian contracts.

But critics question why SAIC has been getting such lucrative assignments, many of which have come as sole-source contracts that are not subject to competitive bidding.