« March 2008 | Main | May 2008 »

April 2008

April 27, 2008

Karl Rove's Name Mentioned in Rezko Trial

  In the Rezko Trial, A New Name Surfaces: Karl Rove
    By Michael Isikoff
    Newsweek

    Saturday 26 April 2008

    The trial of Chicago developer and political fixer Antoin "Tony" Rezko has been closely watched for any mention of the defendant's onetime friend, Barack Obama. But last week, prosecutors threw a curveball, telling the judge that one of their witnesses is prepared to raise the name of another prominent Washington hand: Karl Rove. Former Illinois state official Ali Ata is expected to testify about a conversation he had with Rezko in which the developer alleged Rove was "working with" a top Illinois Republican to remove the Chicago U.S. attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald.

    The allegation, which Rove denies, quickly reverberated in Washington. Democrats in Congress now want to question Ata. They believe he can help buttress their theory that Rove played a key role in discussions that led to the firings of U.S. attorneys at the Justice Department in 2006. The House Judiciary Committee "intends to investigate the facts and circumstances alleged in this testimony," panel chairman Rep. John Conyers of Michigan said in a statement to NEWSWEEK.

    Investigators are intrigued by the timing of the alleged conversation about Fitzgerald. According to the Rezko prosecutors, it took place in November 2004 - weeks after Fitzgerald had subpoenaed Rove to testify for the third time in another matter he was aggressively investigating, the Valerie Plame CIA leak case. A source familiar with Ata's testimony (who asked not to be identified talking about sensitive matters) said that Ata was meeting regularly with Rezko that fall. The two men shared a concern about Fitzgerald's ongoing probe of Illinois public officials. In one of those conversations, the developer allegedly told Ata that Bob Kjellander, a prominent GOP state lobbyist, was talking to Rove about getting rid of Fitzgerald. The reason: to "get a new U.S. attorney" who would not pursue the Illinois corruption probe, the source said. Ata, who has pleaded guilty to corruption-related charges and is now cooperating with the Feds, has no evidence that the conversation took place other than what Rezko allegedly told him, the source says.

    Kjellander denies that he told Rezko anything of the kind. "I never had a discussion with Karl Rove or any other person on the White House staff" about firing Fitzgerald, said Kjellander, now a top GOP official in charge of this summer's convention. Rove's lawyer, Bob Luskin, told NEWSWEEK that Rove "does not recall" a conversation with Kjellander about Fitzgerald. He added that Rove "never talked to anybody in the White House about removing Fitzgerald."

    Conyers's investigators apparently are not convinced. They've filed a civil-contempt lawsuit to force the White House to turn over documents about the U.S. attorney firings. In recent court papers, lawyers for the full House of Representatives charge that the White House has "stonewalled" efforts to sort out the U.S. attorney firings; they cite an e-mail disclosed last year showing that Rove visited the White House counsel's office in 2005 and asked "how we planned to proceed regarding US attorneys … he said the matter was urgent." (In the e-mail, Rove wanted to know if all the attorneys would be asked to resign "or only some of them.") Conyers, whose staff has been probing other allegations of White House meddling in criminal prosecutions, recently renewed a demand for Rove to testify. If he refuses to appear, Conyers said, "the committee is prepared to resort to compulsory process" - i.e., a subpoena.

  -------

Pentagon Stops Putting Out Info Through Retired Officers

Pentagon halts feeding of information to retired officers while issue is reviewed

By Jeff Schogol, Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Saturday, April 26, 2008

ARLINGTON, Va. - The Defense Department has temporarily stopped feeding information to retired military officers pending a review of the issue, said Robert Hastings, principal deputy assistant secretary of Defense for public affairs.

The New York Times first reported on Sunday that the Defense Department was giving information to retired officers serving as pundits for various media organizations in order to garner favorable media coverage.

Some of these retired officers saw their access to key decision-makers as possible business opportunities for the defense contractors they represent, according to the newspaper. The story also alleged that the officers who did not repeat the Bush administration's official line were denied further access to information.

Hastings said he is concerned about allegations that the Defense Department's relationship with the retired military analysts was improper.

"Following the allegations, the story that is printed in the New York Times, I directed my staff to halt, to suspend the activities that may be ongoing with retired military analysts to give me time to review the situation," Hastings said in an interview with Stripes on Friday.

Hastings said he did not discuss the matter with Defense Secretary Robert Gates prior to making his decision. He could not say Friday how long this review might take.

"We'll take the time to do it right," he said.

On Thursday, U.S. Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., said in a speech that he was angered by the allegations raised in the New York Times' story.

"There is nothing inherently wrong with providing information to the public and the press," Skelton said. "But there is a problem if the Pentagon is providing special access to retired officers and then basically using them as pawns to spout the administration's talking points of the day."

Skelton, who is chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said he was also disturbed by the ties between the military officers and defense firms.

"It hurts me to my core to think that there are those from the ranks of our retired officers who have decided to cash in and essentially prostitute themselves on the basis of their previous positions within the Department of Defense," he said.

Hastings, who had not seen Skelton's remarks before Friday's interview, said he is unaware of the Defense Department's past activities with retired military analysts. He took over his current post in March.

"I need a little time to kind of digest that and figure out what the path forward is," he said.

More Elections Problems Exposed

Received from Whistleblower_News, Yahoo Groups 4-27-08

Check this out.  We sure do need people willing to run for office who truly do want to stop the corruption and criminal activities.  I do not know any of these people or issues personally.  See what you think.  –GFS

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rigged USA Elections Exposed

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=JEzY2tnwExs&feature=related

Computer Programmer, Clint Curtis, testified that Tom Feeney (Speaker of the Houe of Florida at the time, currently US Representative) tried to pay him to rig election vote counts.

He is now running in the primary so he can run against Feeney and be a voice in Congress to stop the corruption & work for the people. He needs a little help from all the people who want Congress to represent the people instead of the corporations. 

Read the message I just received below.

Donations can be made on-line at --- www.ClintCurtis. com
<http://www.ClintCur tis.com>

                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~

We may have to withdraw

The time for filing has arrived. We have not raised enough money
to stay in this race unless we can get support from you today.
Two weeks ago we needed $10,000 to stay in this race. We now need
only $2000. Without your help, we will have to withdraw from the
primary.

Contributors we have counted on before have been intimidated by
Kosmas and the party insiders. That means that a party puppet
that will not support our values may have a clear path at going
against Feeney in the General. Our values will not be fulfilled.
Millionaires, the Chamber of Commerce, insurance companies, and
developers already have enough representation in Congress.

There are some that are mesmerized by the dollars and those that
believe the DC insiders know better of our needs and values than
we do ourselves. I am thankful to all of you that have stayed
with me and I promise you that when I am elected I will not
knuckle under to a Democratic leadership that has shown little
ability to pursue what we elected them to do. Democrats need to
start acting like Democrats!

I will help build the coalition that will stop the funding of the
war. I will pass the bill that sets up a prototype V-diesel plant
in Central Florida that will begin this country's road to energy
independence (reducing your fuel cost down to less than 72 cents
per gallon) AND bring jobs to this area. I will crush all free
trade agreements that do not enforce labor and environmental
standards and places American jobs at a disadvantage. Just as
importantly I will end this non-partisan drive within the
Democratic party that has resulted in our Democratic Congress
continuing with the Bush agenda.

Recent polling has shown that we are the only candidate that has
a chance to beat Feeney in the General. It also demonstrated that
except for political insiders Kosmas has no support in District
24.

Please donate whatever amount you can to make our values reality.
What we, as Democrats stand for, is in your hands.

Donations can be made on-line at --- www.ClintCurtis. com
<http://www.ClintCur tis.com> or by mail at P.O. Box 1456,
Titusville FL 32780.

Polling Results As Of 4-15-08

Democrat Primary Voters
Bhola, Gaurav "Garv" (D) 5%
Ron Bobay (D) 7%
Curtis, Clint (D 62%
Feeney, Tom (R) 0%
Kosmas, Suzanne (D) 18%
Undecided 8%

Republican Primary Voters
Bhola, Gaurav "Garv" (D) 0%
Ron Bobay (D) 0%
Curtis, Clint (D 13%
Feeney, Tom (R) 77%
Kosmas, Suzanne (D) 2%
Undecided 8%

General Election Voters
Curtis, Clint (D 47%
Feeney, Tom (R) 39%
Undecided 14%

General Election Voters
Feeney, Tom (R) 53%
Kosmas, Suzanne (D) 31%
Undecided 16%

Julie Omohundro Durham, North Carolina 919-544-3366

April 22, 2008

IRS Gains by Supreme Court Refusal to Hear Murphy v. IRS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
APRIL 21, 2008

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Murphy v. IRS

Advocates To Continue Pressing for Changes in Civil Rights Tax Law

WASHINGTON, DC -- Today, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision not to grant certiorari in the case of Murphy v. IRS. The order, posted on the Court's website this morning, means that the IRS can continue to tax non-pecuniary compensatory damages awarded to victims of whistleblower retaliation and other civil rights violations. These damage awards, which are intended to make the victim "whole" again, include payments for loss of reputation and emotional distress.

The case was brought by Marrita Murphy, an environmental whistleblower who won her case before Department of Labor, and was awarded compensatory damages to vindicate her rights under six federal environmental whistleblower statutes. Murphy filed suit when the IRS demanded that she pay taxes on the "make-whole" award as if it were income. After having her case dismissed, Murphy filed an appeal.

After full briefing and oral argument, the Appeals court initially held that Murphy's award was not income and the tax on her damages violated the U.S. Constitution. Then, under pressure from the Bush Administration, the judges decided to rehear the case. In this ruling, Murphy II, the D.C. Circuit reversed its own previous decision, declaring that non-physical compensatory damages are taxable as gross income.

National Whistleblower Center General Counsel David K Colapinto, who represents Ms. Murphy, released the following statements regarding the Court's decision:

"The DC Circuit's decision was contradictory and wrong. It will have a tragic impact on thousands of whistleblowers and victims of discrimination. We are not surprised though, that the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, as there was not a traditional "split in the circuits," as the DC Circuit was the first court to take this issue on. Given the DC Circuit's difficulty in dealing with this issue, I expect that it will be taken up in other courts across the country."

"It is unfair and unconstitutional to tax victims of discrimination and retaliation when the awards were simply compensation to make them whole again. The money is to restore a loss for personal injury; it is not income."

Unfortunately, as a result of the Court's decision not to hear the Murphy case, whistleblowers and other civil rights victims whose make whole compensatory damages awards are taxed will have to continue to fight the IRS through the courts. The only alternative to continued litigation is for Congress to change the tax code.
Currently pending before Congress is the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act of 2007 ("CRTRA"), H.R. 1540, which would end unfair taxation of noneconomic damages received by those who have suffered unlawful discrimination in the workplace or other violations of their employment rights.

The CRTRA was introduced in the House by Representative John Lewis (D-GA), who was joined by a bipartisan group of original CRTRA cosponsors, including Representatives Deborah Pryce (R-OH), Sander Levin (D-MI), Jim Ramstad (R-MN), Xavier Becerra (D-CA), and Phil English (R-PA). The Senate companion bill was introduced by Senators Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) and Susan Collins (R-ME).

The CRTRA has broad bi-partisan support. It is supported by employer and employee advocacy groups alike because both business and employee organizations recognize that taxing non-economic make whole compensatory damages makes settlement more difficult and results in protracted litigation in employment disputes.

  • For additional information on Murphy v. IRS, including links to the briefs, Click Here

    -end-

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since 1988 the NWC has championed whistleblower protection. The NWC is currently supporting FBI Whistleblower Bassem Youssef, who has reported serious misconduct in the War on Terror, and the NWC is currently assisting Bunnatine Greenhouse (the former Army Corps of Engineers top contracting officer who opposed the no-bid multi billion dollar contracts awarded to Halliburton for the reconstruction of Iraq)

For more information, please visit www.whistleblowers.org and www.whistleblowersblog.org.

Senator Murray Advocates for The Boeing Company

This was sent to me today. Apparently Senator Patty Murray of Washington State sent out a publicity piece regarding her rallying the troups to defend and advocate for The Boeing Company in the most recent Tanker Deal controversy. This writer was not at all happy with what was going on even within The Boeing Company as far as oursourcing of work to non American workers. The writer below is referring to a newsletter with American Flag graphics which did not transfer readably to this post, so I am just posting the writer's comments, after the brief explanation above. - GFS

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I received this quite a while ago, but had not had time to respond to it. I am responding now. I would buy the PR message here, if Boeing did not also outsource much of its work overseas as well. It is rather like the pot calling the kettle rusty for Boeing to make a huge issue of some work being done overseas by Northrop Grumman, as some of the work would also be done here. I fail to see the difference in actual business practices between Boeing and any of these other companies, frankly. I do not appreciate the loss of American jobs, as many of Senator Murray’s constituents would agree, particularly when the job losses are because of Boeings efforts to try to court foreign interests for sales of airplanes and other products. The argument would be much more compelling (and honest) if Boeing did not also outsource so much itself. It was not that many years ago that Boeing “downsized, right sized,” or whatever they chose to call it and reduced the number of machinists in Seattle and other places I expect, and outsourced those jobs to China among other places for the making of parts.  A few years ago, I heard someone who worked for Boeing complaining that the parts they were getting from China were so bad, they had to be re-machined here in Seattle, which rather negated much of the cost savings to the company. Also, outsourcing the composite material manufacturing made no sense, because of consequent loss of jobs stateside, as well as putting that technology at risk, by allowing foreign workers and managers access to what was American cutting-edge technology, (used first militarily in defense contracts), so that we most likely will lose that edge many years earlier than we should have. We used to stay about 7 years ahead, I’m told, but due to poor business decisions, and sloppy security practices, that lead has been greatly reduced, causing more pressure to develop new technology faster to keep at least abreast with our “competition,” and also a financial disadvantage to the US Taxpayers as well, as new products must be purchased sooner and more often. Senator Murray, it appears foolish to frame the problem this way. The whole sorry mess must be cleaned up and soon!

More Conflict of Interest in Justice and Revolving Door Issues

Former Justice Official Accused of Exchanging Favors With Abramoff

By James V. Grimaldi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, April 22, 2008; A08

A federal prosecutor in Maryland has accused a Justice Department official who became the former deputy chief of staff of the criminal division of helping Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff in exchange for a "stream of things of value," according to criminal papers filed yesterday.

Robert E. Coughlin II, who two years ago received a prestigious attorney general's award, provided "assistance to a lobbyist and the lobbyist's law/lobbying firm on particular matters before DOJ while" accepting gifts and favors and discussing a possible job offer, the federal court filing said.

The documents do not name the lobbyist or the firm, but The Washington Post reported last year that Coughlin resigned on April 6, 2007, and was under investigation by a federal task force looking into Abramoff's activities. At the time of Coughlin's allegedly improper activities, Abramoff worked for the lobbying firm Greenberg Traurig.

Several sources familiar with the matter said that Coughlin was lobbied by Abramoff colleague Kevin A. Ring, whose activities remain under investigation. One source, who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the investigation, said Ring lobbied Coughlin to get federal money from the Bureau of Prisons, a division of the Justice Department, to build a jail for the Choctaw tribe, one of Abramoff's clients.

Both Coughlin and Ring worked as staffers in the 1990s to then-Sen. John D. Ashcroft (R-Mo.), who became attorney general in 2001. During the period depicted in the court documents, Coughlin worked in the Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs.

When Coughlin joined the criminal division in 2005, he was recused from the Abramoff inquiry because of a longtime personal friendship with Ring. Investigators came across Coughlin's name while trying to ascertain whether Ring improperly sought or received favors for lobbying clients from people in government, sources told The Post last year.

The gifts Coughlin received are not described, but Abramoff was found guilty in 2006 of giving public officials sports and entertainment tickets, meals at his downtown restaurant and other gratuities to get favors. Ring took Coughlin to sporting events with tickets provided by his lobbying firm, according to sources familiar with the inquiry.

Ring declined comment yesterday.

Abramoff, who has provided extensive assistance to prosecutors, is in federal prison in Maryland serving time for a Florida fraud conviction and is awaiting sentencing on separate charges of mail fraud, conspiracy and tax evasion.

Coughlin was accused of a felony count of violating the federal conflict-of-interest statute. The offense, which allegedly occurred between March 2001 and October 2003, was outlined in a filing known as a criminal information, which prosecutors often use rather than an indictment when the defendant is cooperating with an ongoing investigation.

A plea hearing for Coughlin was scheduled for today. His attorney did not respond yesterday to a phone call and an e-mail requesting comment.

Coughlin is the second Justice Department official whose name has surfaced in the wide-ranging Abramoff investigation. Last year, Sue Ellen Wooldridge, deputy assistant attorney general for environment and natural resources, abruptly resigned when her boyfriend, whom she later married, was notified that he was a criminal target. J. Steven Griles, former deputy secretary of the Interior Department, later pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about Abramoff.

The task force has tracked millions of dollars in meals, trips, tickets, gifts and campaign contributions that the Abramoff lobbying team lavished on lawmakers and staffers. The investigation has resulted in convictions and guilty pleas from lobbyists, staffers, two administration officials and a congressman.

Staff writer Carrie Johnson contributed to this report.

April 21, 2008

Joe Carson's OSC Watch 4-19-08 Update

OSC Watch <www.oscwatch. org> is focused on
exposing and stopping systemic and persistent
lawbreaking in US Office of Special Counsel
(OSC). OSC Watch contends that OSC, since at
least 1989, has fundamentally failed to comply
with its most important nondiscretionary duty to
enforce the civil service laws, rules, and
regulations under its (frequently sole)
jurisdiction. OSC Watch contends that OSC, in
investigating about 30,000 complaints since 1989
of violations of law, rule, or regulation under
its jurisdiction, has failed to investigate the
complaint, determine whether there is reasonable
cause to believe violations occurred, and, if so,
to report them to the involved agency head, per 5
U.S.C. 1214(e), and create a permanent, public
record of its report and the agency response, per 5 U.S.C. 1219.

OSC, contrary to the clear wording of the law,
its legislative history, and a final decision of
a federal court - all of which state that 5
U.S.C. 1214(e) applies to ANY law, rule, or
regulations, including those within OSC's
jurisdiction, still openly holds to its
self-nullifying interpretation of the law it is
charged to implement, that it does not apply to
laws, rules, or regulations under its jurisdiction.

OSC is the "immune system" of the Executive
Branch agencies - it has jurisdiction for the
laws, rules, and regulations that uphold the
merit principles of the federal civil service,
particularly to prevent agency retribution
against concerned federal employees. Because it
has nullified the law - 5. U.S.C. 1214(e) - that
is the heart of its obligations to do so, by its
untenable claim that it does not apply to the
laws, rules, and regulations under its
jurisdiction, OSC is a broken "immune
system." As a result, the merit principles of
the federal civil service are battered, much
corruption and dysfunction in many federal
workplaces has taken root and flourished, leading
to violations of laws, rules, and regulations not
under OSC's jurisdiction in those agencies, such
as the possible politically motivated prosecutions at Department of Justice.

OSC Watch has been in contact with Alabama Gov.
Siegelman, "Exhibit A" of possibly politically
motivated prosecutions by the Department of
Justice, and the House Judiciary Committee about
its concerns that OSC's lawbreaking, resulting
from its interpretation of 5 U.S.C. 1214(e), is a
significant part of the context in which the
abuses in the Department of Justice occurred.

The following recent press release of the House
Judiciary Committee is relevant to OSC Watch's
concerns that OSC's fundamental failure to
implement the law to enforce the laws under its
jurisdiction has contributed to corruption in the Department of Justice.

************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* *******

U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary

For Immediate Release
Contact: Jonathan Godfrey
http://judiciary. house.gov/ newscenter. aspx?A=955

April 17, 2008
Melanie Roussell

(Washington, DC)- Today, House Judiciary
Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) and
Committee Members Linda Sánchez (D-CA), Artur
Davis (D-AL), and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) announced
three critical actions in the Committee's
investigation into allegations of selective or
poltiically- motivated prosecution in the Justice
Department. The Members today invited Karl Rove
to testify before the committee; urged the
Justice Department's Office of the Inspector
General and Office of Professional Responsibility
to investigate those allegations; and demanded
that Attorney General Michael Mukasey provide
additional documents on this subject.

Today's actions result from the Committee's
majority staff report, also released today, which
details the cases, interviews and documents they
have reviewed since the Committee began its investigation last year.

"There continue to be numerous complaints of
selective or politically motivated prosecution
since our investigation began last year," Conyers
said. "The actions we are taking today, including
calling Karl Rove to testify, are an effort to
get to the bottom of this matter."

Today's announcement stems from the Committee's
2007 oversight hearing on selective prosecution,
during which testimony was heard and documents
were entered into the record regarding cases from
Alabama, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Georgia, and
Pennsylvania. Since the hearing, majority
committee staff has continued its investigation
with interviews and document collection about
additional cases across the country.

"While this report is extensive and significant
progress has been made in our investigation, many
facts remain unknown," Conyers said. "The Justice
Department has simply not been forthcoming and I
feel the only way to move this investigation
forward is to seek further independent
investigation and testimony from Karl Rove, who
appears to be the missing link in a chain from
the White House to the Justice Department."

The letters and the majority staff report are
available at <http://judiciary. house.gov/ Printshop. aspx?Section= 833>.

##110-JUD-041708# #

GSA Admin. Continues Battle with Agency IG

GSA administrator fires latest salvo in battle with agency inspector general

Give General Services Administration chief Lurita Doan credit for this much -- she's not afraid of making new, and powerful, adversaries.

First, it was Brian Miller, GSA's inspector general, with whom she has feuded virtually since the day she took office. Then Doan drew the wrath of Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., when they alleged she improperly meddled in GSA contract negotiations.

The most recent object of Doan's ire is Kenneth Kaiser, chairman of the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency's Integrity Committee, and assistant director of the FBI's criminal division. In her second letter to Kaiser in less than two months, Doan again railed at him over his January dismissal of several whistleblower allegations, calling Kaiser's explanation "absurd" and "particularly offensive to all of the people over the past several months that have demonstrated personal courage in bringing these allegations to your attention."

The committee, which is responsible for probing complaints against inspectors general, announced earlier this year that it had dismissed a number of serious whistleblower allegations filed by four attorneys in GSA's IG office against Miller and his top deputies. The investigation lasted less than six weeks. At that time, Doan wrote her first missive to Kaiser on the subject, saying the decision "confirms the suspicions of many that the PCIE is a hollow shell, that the PCIE exists only as a fig leaf to provide the illusion of oversight over IG misconduct, but, in fact, its real purpose is to whitewash any wrongdoing, avoid responsible action and ensure a blind eye to IG misconduct."

PCIE dismissed the complaints, because they did not fall within the purview of its oversight powers and referred them to an outside IG office. The FBI said the complaints have been reviewed by both PCIE and another inspector general, and the results have been sent to Clay Johnson, deputy director of management at the Office of Management and Budget, and Kaiser.

"Due to privacy issues, the PCIE cannot comment on the outcome, nor can we comment on Mr. Kaiser's letter to Administrator Doan," said Stephen Kodak Jr., a spokesman for Kaiser.

The dispute dates back to the fall of 2006, when a female employee in GSA's inspector general office filed a series of whistleblower complaints against Miller and Robert Samuels, his former top deputy. Shortly thereafter, Samuels assigned the employee to an eight-month nonreimbursable detail with the Housing and Urban Development Department. Samuels extended the detail several times. That action sparked a series of complaints and countercomplaints among attorneys in the IG counsel's office.

Miller and Samuels have denied the allegations against them. The IG's office did not respond to repeated requests for comment about Doan's letters.

Doan has attempted to link the whistleblower's complaints to her own long-running and very public feud with Miller, charging that they are fruit from the same poisonous tree.

The administrator has filed numerous complaints with PCIE against Miller, charging the IG with improper contracting, leaking documents to the media, falsifying records and issuing excessive bonuses to his staff. She also complained that Miller's tactics had caused three contractors -- Canon, EMC Corp. and Sun Microsystems -- to cancel their GSA schedule contracts.

Doan also appears to be seeking help in her battle with Miller from an unlikely source: Grassley.

She wrote to Grassley on March 24, briefing the senator about PCIE's complaints and urging cooperation. "We need to ensure a hostile workplace does not exist at GSA, which might prevent us from attracting and retaining qualified contracting officers. I am committed to this effort and to helping the four whistleblowers."

Grassley, a longtime supporter of whistleblower rights, has yet to respond to the letter, according to a spokeswoman.

Miller has investigated Doan for her role in a Sun Microsystems contract, her alleged attempt to give a sole-source contract to a friend and her participation in a politically motivated conference. Last year, the Office of Special Counsel found that Doan had violated the Hatch Act, a federal law restricting political activity by executive branch employees.

Doan has denied the allegations and said Miller is angry about spending cuts and increased oversight she proposed for the IG's office.

Tanker Contract Uproar Continues

Uproar over tanker contract continues as lawmakers clash

CongressDaily

Threatening to derail the Air Force's selection of a foreign-designed air tanker to refuel military warplanes, a group of lawmakers led a Capitol Hill rally of American aerospace workers Thursday and pledged to shoot down the deal.

As the senators and representatives lined up at a news conference with Boeing Co. union leaders and engineers across the street from the Capitol, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., took the Senate floor to stoutly defend the Air Force's choice of a tanker that would be built by a consortium of Northrop Grumman Corp. and EADS, a European consortium whose Airbus airframe would serve as the tanker's skeleton.

While it remains unclear exactly how the huge contract for the 179 tankers could be repudiated, Rep. Norman Dicks, D-Wash., whose district embraces thousands of Boeing workers, said the upcoming Defense appropriations process could provide the opportunity.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., who led the protest, said the bipartisan opposition to the deal is weighing all of the options to short-circuit the Air Force's decision. One risky approach might be an attempt to abrogate any contracts between the Pentagon and Northrop Grumman-EADS -- an option that could send the dispute into U.S. courts and drag out the actual building of the plane by years.

Boeing is now seeking to overturn to contract through the formal protest it filed with GAO, which must issue a ruling by June 19.

At the rally, Murray and Dicks were joined by several other lawmakers whose states and districts could be harmed by Boeing's loss of the work. Others on hand to rail against the Air Force decision were Sens. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., and Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Reps. Todd Tiahrt, R-Kan.; Jay Inslee, D-Wash., and Dave Reichert, R-Wash.

The protestors accused the Air Force of stacking the deck against Boeing and, as Dicks complained, "doing tricky things" to justify the award to Northrop-EADS. "They bent over backward to make sure Boeing didn't get it," he fumed.

Opponents of the contract argued that U.S. security is undermined when contracts for American weapons systems and technology are granted to foreign companies, and contended that defense dollars should not be spent abroad. "We need to keep our taxpayers' dollars here at home to help our country's economy," Murray said.

The construction of the planes could cost up to $40 billion over a decade. Boeing workers have said the loss of the contract could end thousands of jobs in Washington, Kansas and other states.

As the protest of the contract continued, Wicker was on the Senate floor extolling its virtues. Northrop Grumman's proposal, he maintained, represented "a better product and better value for the taxpayer." He noted that assembly of the plane, from major parts manufactured in Europe, would take place in Alabama and parts for it would be made in 49 U.S. states, including along the Gulf Coast in his home state.

He took issue with Boeing's estimate of job losses, insisting that the Northrop Grumman tanker deal "will create 48,000 direct and indirect jobs across our country," and complained that opponents have spread misinformation about the economic impact of the project.

A Really BIG Revolving Door

Case in Point – A Really BIG Revolving Door!

McCain seems to be delivering a promise of more of the same. 

-GFS

----------------------------------------------------------------

Brokering Power In Business and Politics
Buyout Firm Founder Fred Malek's Career Spans Nixon to McCain

By Michael S. Rosenwald
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, April 21, 2008; D01

Three guys in suits came strolling down the hallway. Fred Malek, chairman and senior adviser of a District buyout group, waited for them in his corner office. One of the men was Scott Rued, a managing partner at Malek's firm. He was with an investment banker, who was representing the third man, an owner of a logistics company that Rued coveted.

The company's owner looked tense. Perhaps he should have been. He had started his firm in his living room, and now he was wrestling with giving it up to some men he barely knew. A few of months ago, Rued asked Malek to have breakfast with the owner to smooth the way for the man to attend the meeting that was about to happen: the initial negotiations to merge the company into one of Malek's.

Malek, by his admission, is not entirely warm and fuzzy, but he is likable and has a knack for winning people's trust. He could relax a mouse who was about to be eaten by a cat. In this case, he created a clubby, insider atmosphere, showing off photos from a lifetime of moving in and out of power. There's Malek with his former executive assistant, Gen. Colin Powell. There's Malek with his ex-boss, President Richard Nixon. There's Malek with former president Bush, after parachuting out a plane to celebrate Bush's 80th birthday. "Did Bush jump, too?" Rued asked. "Hell yeah," Malek said.

More small talk ensued. Then Rued and the banker went off to another room to start their talks, which was emblematic of a reality that Malek seems perfectly comfortable with these days: He is no longer the man making the deals. At 71, he is the elder statesman -- elder capitalist -- of Thayer Hidden Creek. Following the restructuring of the firm several years ago after some costly missteps, Malek has firmly stepped away from the day-to-day operations, functioning as an adviser, a listening post, an emissary of deals.

"He opens doors, and he knows which ones should be opened," said Norman Augustine, a former chief executive of Lockheed Martin who sits on Thayer's board.

In the weeks ahead, Malek will temporarily retreat further from Thayer. He is slipping back into the political world, where he was once, in Powell's words, Nixon's disciplinarian and later the campaign chairman for President George H.W. Bush. He has been drawn back by an affection for Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), a fellow Vietnam War veteran with unpopular positions in the Republican party who Malek says reminds him of one of his favorite credos, which he learned at West Point: Have the courage to choose the harder right vs. the easier wrong.

Malek is a co-chairman of McCain's campaign finance committee, an unusual position for him because he previously has served in more strategic roles. But it's a job that fits Malek at this time in his life, in that he has come to know a lot of people with a lot of money. Asked why he thought Malek will be successful raising money, Bill Marriott, Malek's boss when he oversaw Marriott's hotels, said: "He has an amazing Rolodex. And when he calls people, they pick up the phone."

After all these years, and despite some embarrassing controversies and a disheartening end in his bid to buy the Washington Nationals, Malek remains one of Washington's ultimate insiders. The other night he had President Bush -- the one living in the White House -- over for a fundraising dinner at his palatial home overlooking the Potomac River in McLean, where he lives with his wife of 46 years, Marlene Malek. He is not a billionaire, but he has his own plane and a house in Aspen. He has certainly come a long way from growing up the son of a Chicago beer delivery man -- a Democrat, no less.

"My parents taught me to achieve," Malek said, sitting on the couch in his living room. "And I found the wonderful gratification that comes from achievement. The motivation to achieve and the fulfillment of achievement gives me great satisfaction." His philosophy on work brings to mind his other favorite credo, from Bill Marriott: Success is never final.

Malek, who is wiry, fit and always well put together, graduated from West Point in 1959 and later was an airborne Army Ranger in Vietnam, completing a tour deep in the jungles. (His buyout firm and his hotel company are named after Brig. Gen. Sylvanus Thayer, known as the father of West Point.) After Vietnam, Malek got his MBA from Harvard Business School and eventually found his way into the Nixon administration, where he was a special assistant to the president and then deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget. One of Malek's key hires was Colin Powell.

"He had a reputation of -- I'll let you characterize it -- but within the bureaucracy he was the guy who the president looked to put discipline in the system," Powell said in an interview. "Fred was a disciplinarian. He was also seen as a political operative. That's a negative term nowadays. But it's a positive term. The president had an agenda and wanted to make sure it was being followed. OMB is the turnstile of government. Fred was very influential."

Malek was exceedingly loyal to Nixon. "I believed he was telling the truth until the very end," Malek said. And it was under Nixon that Malek made what he terms the biggest mistake of his life. At the president's order, he counted how many Jews worked in the Bureau of Labor Statistics. (Nixon was convinced that some Jewish employees of the agency weren't loyal.) Controversy surrounding his actions forced him to resign from Bush's campaign in 1988. Malek is remorseful about the episode and adamant that he is not an anti-Semite, just a guy who made a dumb mistake -- a very big dumb mistake. He sought counsel from -- and was later forgiven by -- some of the world's Jewish leaders, including Abraham Foxman, the director of the Anti-Defamation League.

"He has been very remorseful ever since," Powell said. "But it did make it difficult for him to get back into government."

Malek's private sector positions and the number of deals he has made in business are almost too long to list. He worked for McKinsey & Co. He led a buyout of Northwest Airlines and CB Richard Ellis. His longest stint at any company was 14 years at Marriott International starting in the 1970s, where he rose to become president of the company's hotel division. At Marriott, he became close with a junior executive named Lee Pillsbury, and the two later became partners in Thayer Lodging Group, an Annapolis company that owns more than a dozen hotels. Malek is still active in its day-to-day operations.

Pillsbury said that during their time at Marriott, Malek "had the most discipline of anyone I had ever met. His time management was legendary. He walked in to the office at 5 minutes to 8 and left at 5 minutes after 5, and everything was done and finished on time the way it was supposed to be."

Nearly everyone who has worked with Malek said the precision of his actions are legendary and border on the bizarre. "When Fred tells you that he will go to the bathroom at 10, it's not going to be 9:59 or 10:01. There is nothing too trivial for Fred to keep his word on," Pillsbury said.

That reputation seemed to connect the owner of the logistics company to Malek. After Rued and the investment banker chatted privately, the group made its way to a conference room not far from Malek's office. They sat at a long, shiny wooden table. Rued, the investment banker and the company's owner took off their jackets and loosened their ties. Malek stayed buttoned up, jacket on.

Rued made a presentation about how he saw the man's firm fitting into theirs. But the owner had questions. He had lots of questions. And he seemed hesitant, particularly about giving up total control. Malek said he understood how he felt: "It's like jumping out of an airplane." At one point, the man looked at Malek and said, "I want to do this with you." Malek asked what he meant. The man said he wanted to go around the country and make nice-nice with potential customers with Malek at his side. "I want you to be you, to do your thing" the man said. Again, he repeated, "I want to do this with you."

Malek said yes, he would help the owner build relationships with customers. "I do what I say I'm going to do," Malek added. "That's why I've been around so long."